Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Recap: John Paulus' Emails About Clay Aiken

Last night on his blog, John Paulus posted alleged IM communications that he's had with Clay Aiken. He has since deleted them, but here is part of what he posted (date of the IM is February 5, 2007):

"Ok here's just a tease. I will provide no more than this.

Clay (2/5/2007 6:02:53 PM): How is your new job? Going well?
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:03:38 PM): My new job is just a temporary thing, but it is doing well. Thank you.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:03:56 PM): It got me out of the house and interacting with people.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:04:02 PM): Plus, I love to work.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:04:24 PM): That's good. Hopefully things will start going better for me in the next few months.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:04:28 PM): Hate getting up so early though. I am a night owl, so these early mornings are rough.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:04:37 PM): I hope they do.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:04:55 PM): They will.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:04:56 PM): I know that for a fact.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:05:00 PM): Good.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:05:33 PM): Don't tell me about it if you've told your other online friends. I don't want to be accused of leaking the information.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:05:33 PM): Do you know who that Percocet is?
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:05:49 PM): I don't know of her personally.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:06:17 PM): I do know that it is someone you use to IM and e-mail with some time ago.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:06:17 PM): Her? Female?
Clay (2/5/2007 6:06:18 PM): Do you know what her first name is?
Clay (2/5/2007 6:06:28 PM): Is her first name Sue?
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:06:31 PM): It's a female.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:06:38 PM): It is NOT Sue.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:06:59 PM): Thankfully.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:07:06 PM): If you are thinking that it's your friend Sue, I can tell you that it is not.
Clay (2/5/2007 6:07:06 PM): Do you know Sue?
Clay (2/5/2007 6:07:25 PM): Friend...ha.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:07:25 PM): Yes, but not too well.
John Paulus (2/5/2007 6:08:11 PM): Now you aren't being nice to me to get information are you?
Clay (2/5/2007 6:08:31 PM): No!
Clay (2/5/2007 6:08:53 PM): Just curious.
John Paulus Homepage 05.07.07 - 11:55 pm #"

In the above IM, John appears civil with "Clay", even expressing concern over being regarded as someone who "leaks" information about him. Early this morning, John Paulus denied that he had made any statements in any e-mails about Clay Aiken's weight or sexual activities at his home.

"First of all, I didn't see what was posted at Perc's blog, but if it had on there comments about him being too fat to top or about having sex while others were upstairs then I can assure you that those comments did NOT come from me.
John Paulus Homepage 05.08.07 - 2:34 am #'

Here are e-mails from John containing exactly such information about Clay. Notice in the last e-mail, John's effort to manipulate Percocet into blogging about the Scandals blog. In other e-mails, John passed along information with the expectation of Percocet blogging about it.

The following e-mails dated February 3, 2007 were posted on this blog on February 28 here:

http://claymate411.blogspot.com/2007_02_25_archive.html#5970234711552817050


Any of these e-mails can be forwarded to anyone who questions their authenticity. John's comments are in red.

-------------------

Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 7:20:07 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Oh, you can bet I don't trust him. Not as far as I could through him and despite my prolific weight training, that wouldn't be very far at all. I believe about 15% that comes from his mouth and that's no exaggeration whatsoever. Listen, I get to talk or chat with him often. I know him VERY well and I know many of his friends. We all know that he's a habitual liar- and NOT very good. For this very reason alone, I imagine many in the entertainment industry don't want to bother or have anything to do with him. The man is a mess and he is doing it to himself.

.com wrote:
Hi John,

I'm glad you gave Clay a talking to. I believe Clay was either high or out of his mind when he made that blog. All his nutcase fans feel like Clay has called them to battle. Unreal. Please be careful with Clay. I've had experience in my life with both drug users and people with mental illness who wouldn't get help and I've learned that you can trust neither.

If I were you, I wouldn't trust Clay at all right now. Don't confide in him. If he's out of sorts enough to fuck with his official fan club, I don't think there is anyone who he wouldn't hurt. Hell, he's even at the point where he is hurting himself and he doesn't seem to care. Clay has the money to get the best possible help for himself but he refuses to, and if he doesn't, he's going to go down in flames and he'll deserve to. Don't let him take you with him.

_________________________________________________________________


Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 8:42:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
\.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Well, I know Clay a lot better than he thinks I do. He thinks I am gullible, that I have no doubt. I just want to tell you a quick story. There's this guy that's been wanting to go out with me for about 18 months, but he lives in Chapel Hill which is nearly an hour from me so I have been reluctant. He's very very attractive and athletic, any way, he was telling me that Clay started to chat with him online and that they went out to lunch. He made it clear at lunch to Clay that there wouldn't be anything sexual whatsoever between them. He hasn't heard from Clay since. However, Clay has been seeing his friend on a regular basis. I'm telling you, Clay has got to be the biggest whore in the Raleigh area. Without a doubt. Oh, and just for a bit more of information. Both guys are TOPS! Could it be that Clay is now a bottom? Maybe his belly sticks out more than his d**k does and he can't use it anymore. lol

.com wrote:
LOL! John, you sure have Clay's number! I love it!! See, Clay is convinced that there's nobody smarter than he is. But you and I both know that YOU are! I hope he keeps running his mouth to you and you sit back and laugh because you know you've got him! LOL

____________________________________________________________


Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 8:58:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)

No, he has no idea that I know about him going to lunch with this guy or that I know of the guy that's been topping him on a regular occassion. There are a lot of guys that I know that Clay's been with. One day when he pulls some crap with me and tries to feed me one of his lies like; I've learned my lesson and I'm not hooking up anymore, then I'll ask- does that include so and so who had you screaming and reaching for your pillow and Kristy was sleeping upstairs in her room. lol I've already shocked him with a half a dozen guys names he's been with that no one has even heard about. Perhaps, this is why he talks to me- afraid that I'll reveal even more about him. I can tell you right now that Matt Clemens and my knowledge about the whole episode really worried him. He told me that himself. He said that if people found out he cut his concert off early and held up the tour bus to meet with Matt one last time, it could ruin him. That is what forced him to say "uncle" and apologize. Not that it was meaningful, but at least I got him to give in. Something I am sure very few people have been able to do.

.com wrote:
Does Clay know you were considering dating the guy from Chapel Hill? If so, that is a nasty betrayal! I'd LMAO if you ever hit it off with John Dahlstrom! Clay IS a whore in ALL aspects of his life.

________________________________________________________________


Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 9:22:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Oh, if you only knew how many times I sit back and laugh at him as he tries to BS me and I let him think that I believe him. Then once he's in so deep, I throw in something like this; well if that's the case and you've learned not to cheat then why did you try to hook up with Brandon while in Maryland on your tour. By the point, I normally get- "I've got to go. Talk to you later." Yes, with Clay's blog the focus of rebuttal should not have been to argue the point of whether or not he was dismissing the tabloid or Perez's claims, but how he's encouranging the youths on his sight to write about sex and how that is so not role model like. See this is something that the rabid mates would have much more difficulty arguing with and it will have thrown it back into Clay's face and caused his little blog to have backfired. He wants people to debate the truthfullness of the webcams, but he would never imagine that the debate would have been his encourgement of "sex stories" staring Clay Aiken and then rewarding perhaps a 13 year old fan for it. I think you really should consider writing a blog about that aspect of it and use a picture of Clay with children with a headline, Clay encourages his fans to write a sex scandal staring him.

________________________________________________________________

So, it appears that John was quite comfortable presenting one face to "Clay", all the while propagating rumors and gossip about Clay's private life and revealing his duplicity and hypocrisy in his e-mails to Percocet. John now claims that he thinks Clay is a "nice" guy, and has referred to himself as "nice" and "honest". It's interesting that John seems to have a very different definition of "nice" and "honest" than most people.

All of John's e-mails to Percocet can be found in the archives here:

Jan. e-mails:

http://claymate411.blogspot.com/2007_02_25_archive.html#6048661605430640438

Feb. e-mails:

http://claymate411.blogspot.com/2007_02_25_archive.html#5970234711552817050


Mar. e-mails:

http://claymate411.blogspot.com/2007_02_25_archive.html#6427057342848579935